30.10.2007
Библиография
1. Palella FJ Jr et al. Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. HIV Outpatient Study Investigators. The New England Journal of Medicine, 1998, 338(13):853–860.
2. Sterne JA et al. Long-term effectiveness of potent antiretroviral therapy in preventing AIDS and death: a prospective cohort study. The Lancet, 2005, 366(9483):378–384.
3. Lewden C. Responders to antiretroviral treatment over 500 CD4/mm³ reach same mortality rates as general population: APRICO and Aquitaine Cohorts. 10th European Aids Conference, Dublin, 17–20 November, 2005 (Abstract PE18.4/8).
4. Gilks CF et al. The WHO public-health approach to antiretroviral treatment against HIV in resource-limited settings, The Lancet, 2006, 368(9534): 505–510.
5. Bartlett JG, Gallant JE. 2003 Medical Management of HIV Infection. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University, Division of Infectious Disease and AIDS Service. 2003 (http://www.hopkins-aids.edu/publications/book/03MMHIV1to3.pdf, accessed 11 September 2006).
6. Wilson IB et al. Quality of HIV care provided by nurse practitioners, physician assistants and physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2005, 143(10):729–736.
7. Aberg JA et al. Primary care guidelines for the management of persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus: recommendations of the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2004, 39:609–629.
8. Mellors JW et al. Plasma viral load and CD4+ lymphocytes as prognostic markers of HIV-1 infection. Annals of Internal Medicine,1997, 126(12):946–954.
9. Savès M et al. Risk factors for coronary heart disease in patients treated for human immunodeficiency virus infection compared with the general population. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2003, 37(2):292–298.
10. Friis-Moller N et al. Combination antiretroviral therapy and the risk of myocardial infarction. The New England Journal of Medicine, 2003, 349(21):1993–2003.
11. Pragna Patel. Incidence of AIDS defining and non-AIDS defining malignancies among HIV-infected persons. 13th Annual Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (13th CROI), Denver, 5–8 February 2006 (Poster 813).
12. HIV testing methods. Geneva, Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), 1997 (UNAIDS Technical Upd ate WC 503.1).
13. Mulcahy F et al. CD4 counts in pregnancy do not accurately reflect the need for long-term HAART. 13th Annual Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI), Denver, 5–8 February 2006 (Abstract 704b).
14. Hawkins D et al. Guidelines for the management of HIV infection in pregnant women and the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV. HIV Medicine, 2005, 6:107–148.
15. Friis-Moller N et al. Exposure to PI and NNRTI and risk of myocardial infarction: results from the D:A:D study. 13th Annual Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI), Denver, 5–8 February 2006 (Abstract 144).
16. Markowity M et al. Infection with multidrug resistant, dual-tropic HIV-1 and rapid progression to AIDS: a case report. The Lancet, 2005, 365(9464):1031–1038.
17. Urbina A, Jones K. Crystal methamphetamine, its analogues, and HIV infection: medical and psychiatric aspects of a new epidemic. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2004, 38(6):890–894.
18. Gregory M et al. Illicit drug use and HIV-1 disease progression: a longitudinal study in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. American Journal of Epidemiology, 2006, 163(5):412–420.
19. Markowitz M et al. Infection with multidrug resistant, dual-tropic HIV-1 and rapid progression to AIDS: a case report. The Lancet, 2005, 365(9464):1031–1038.
20. Kassutto S et al. Longitudinal analysis of clinical markers following antiretroviral therapy initiated during acute or early HIV type 1 infection. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2006,42:1024–1031.
21. The EACS Euroguidelines Group. European guidelines for the clinical management and treatment of HIV-infected adults in Europe. AIDS, 2003, 17(Suppl.):S3–S26.
22. British HIV Association guidelines for the treatment of HIV-infected adults with antiretroviral therapy. London, British HIV Association, 2003 (http://www.bhiva.org/guidelines/2003/hiv/index.html, accessed 30 May 2006).
23. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1 infected adults and adolescents. Bethesda, United States Department of Health and Human Services (DHSS), 2004.
24. Salzberger B et al. German-Austrian recommendations for the antiretroviral therapy on HIV-infections. European Journal of Medical Research, 2004, 9:491–504.
25. Egger M et al. Prognosis of HIV-1-infected patients starting highly active antiretroviral therapy: a collaborative analysis of prospective studies. The Lancet, 2002, 360(9327):119–129.
26. Phillips AN et al. Viral load outcome of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor regimens for 2203 mainly antiretroviral-experienced patients. AIDS, 2001, 15(18):2385–2395.
27. Sterling TR et al. Improved outcomes with earlier initiation of highly active antiretroviral therapy among human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients who achieve durable virologic suppression: longer follow-up of an observational cohort study. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2003, 188(11):1659–1665.
28. Opravil M et al. Clinical efficacy of early initiation of HAART in patients with asymptomatic HIV infection and CD4 cell count >350 x 10(6) /l. AIDS, 2002, 16(10):1371–1381.
29. Gras L et al. Predictors of changes in CD4 cell count seven years after starting HAART. 13th Annual Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI), Denver, 5–8 February 2006 (Abstract 530).
30. Palella FJ Jr et al. Survival benefit of initiating antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected persons in different CD4+ cell strata. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2003, 138(8):620–626.
31. Keruly J et al. Increases in CD4 cell count to five years in persons with sustained virologic suppression. 13th Annual Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI), Denver, 5–8 February 2006 (Abstract 529).
32. Wensing AMJ, et al. Analysis from more than 1800 newly diagnosed patients with HIV from 17 European countries shows that 10% of the patients carry primary drug resistance: the CATCH study. The 2nd IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment, International AIDS Society and ANRS, Paris, 13 July 2003 (Abstract LB1).
33. Ross L et al. Prevalence of antiretroviral drug resistance and resistance mutations in antiretroviral therapy (ART) naive HIV infected individuals from 40 US cities. 44th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC), Washington, 30 October–2 November 2004 (Abstract H-173).
34. De Mendoza C et al. Evidence for a different transmission efficiency of viruses with distinct drug-reistance genotypes. 12th International Drug Resistance Workshop, Los Cabos, Mexico, 10–13 June 2003 (Abstract 130).
35. Grant GM et al. Declining nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor primary resistance in San Francisco 2000–2002. 12th International Drug Resistance Workshop, Los Cabos, Mexico, 10–13 June 2003 (Abstract 120).
36. Resistance Orientation to WHO Methodology for surveillance of transmitted HIV Drug Resistance. Geneva, WHO, 2006 (http://www.who.int/hiv/drugresistance/HIVDRSurveillance2006.ppt#294,1,Slide 1, accessed 5 July 2007).
37. Protocol for evaluation of transmitted HIV drug resistance using specimens from HIV sentinel serosurveys in resource-limited settings (Draft). Geneva, WHO, 2006 (http://www.who.int/entity/hiv/drugresistance/HIVDRsurvthresholdprotocol2006.pdf, accessed 5 July 2007).
38. Cane P et al. Time trends in primary resistance to HIV drugs in the United Kingdom: multicentre observational study. BMJ, 2005, 331(7529):1368.
39. de Mendoza C et al. Antiretroviral recommendations may influence the rate of transmission of drug-resistant HIV type 1. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2005, 41(2):227–232.
40. Daar ES, Richman DD. Confronting the emergence of drug-resistant HIV type 1: impact of antiretroviral therapy on individual and population resistance. AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, 2005, 21(5):343–357.
41. McDoll et al. Emtricitabine and 3TC: interchangeable? A systemic review. 10th European AIDS Conference (EACS), Dublin, 17–20 November 2005 (Poster 7.3/17).
42. Gallant JE et al. Tenofovir DF, emtricitabine, and efavirenz vs. zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz for HIV. The New England Journal of Medicine, 2006, 354(3):251–260.
43. DeJesus E et al. Abacavir versus zidovudine combined with lamivudine and efavirenz, for the treatment of antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected adults. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2004, 39(7):1038–1046.
44. Barrios A et al. Paradoxical CD4+ T-cell decline in HIV-infected patients with complete virus suppression taking tenofovir and didanosine. AIDS, 2005, 19(6):569–575.
45. Saag MS et al. Efficacy and safety of emtricitabine vs stavudine in combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive patients: a randomized trial. JAMA, 2004, 292(2):180–189.
46. Bonnet F et al. Risk factors for hyperlactataemia in HIV-infected patients, Aquitaine Cohort, 1999–2003. Antiviral Chemistry & Chemotherapy, 2005, 16(1):63–67.
47. Mallon PW et al. A prospective evaluation of the effects of antiretroviral therapy on body composition in HIV-1-infected men starting therapy. AIDS, 2003, 17(7):971–979.
48. Shah SS, Rodriguez T, McGowan JP. Miller Fisher variant of Guillain-Barré syndrome associated with lactic acidosis and stavudine therapy. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2003, 36(10):131–133.
49. Bernasconi E et al. Abnormalities of body fat distribution in HIV-infected persons treated with antiretroviral drugs: The Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 1999, 31(1):50–55.
50. Calza L et al. Substitution of nevirapine or efavirenz for protease inhibitor versus lipid-lowering therapy for the management of dyslipidaemia. AIDS, 2005, 19(10):1051–1058.
51. Gulick RM et al. Triple-nucleoside regimens versus efavirenz-containing regimens for the initial treatment of HIV-1 infection. The New England Journal of Medicine, 2004, 350(18):1850–1861.
52. Staszewski S et al. Efavirenz plus zidovudine and lamivudine, efavirenz plus indinavir, and indinavir plus zidovudine and lamivudine in the treatment of HIV-1 infection in adults. Study 006 Team. The New England Journal of Medicine, 1999, 341(25):1865–1873.
53. Bartlett JA et al. Abacavir/lamivudine in combination with efavirenz, amprenavir/ritonaviror stavudine: ESS40001 (CLASS) preliminary 48 weeks results. 14th International AIDS Conference, Barcelona, July 2002 (Abstract TuOrB1189).
54. van Leeuwen R et al. A randomized trial to study first-line combination therapy with or without a protease inhibitor in HIV-1–infected patients. AIDS, 2003, 17(7):987–999.
55. Sheran M. The nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors efavirenz and nevirapine in the treatment of HIV. HIV Clinical Trials, 2005, 6(3):158–168.
56. DART Virology Group and Trial Team. Virological response to a triple nucleoside/nucleotide analogue regimen over 48 weeks in HIV-1 infected adults in Africa. AIDS, 2006, 20:1391–1399.
57. Gallant JE et al. Early virologic nonresponse to tenofovir, abacavir and lamivudine in HIV-infected antiretroviral-naive subjects. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2005,192(11):1921–1930.
58. Jemsek J, Hutcherson P, Harper E. Poor virologic responses and early emergence of resistance in treatment naïve, HIV–infected patients receiving a once daily triple nucleoside regimen of didanosine, lamivudine, and tenofovir DF. 11th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, San Francisco, February 2004.
59. Palella FJ, Delaney KM, Moorman AC. Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. The New England Journal of Medicine, 1998, 338:853–860.
60. Perelson AS et al. HIV-1 dynamics in vivo: virion clearance rate, infected cell life-span, and viral generation time. Science, 1996, 271(5255):1582–1586.
61. Mannheimer S et al. The consistency of adherence to antiretroviral therapy predicts biologic outcomes for human immunodeficiency virus-infected persons in clinical trials. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2002, 34(8):1115–1121.
62. Fischl M et al. Impact of directly observed therapy on long-term outcomes in HIV clinical trials. 8th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI), Chicago, 4–8 February 2001 (Abstract 528).
63. Bangsberg DR et al. Adherence-resistance relationships for protease and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors explained by virological fitness. AIDS, 2006, 20(2):223–231.
64. Maher K et al. Disease progression, adherence and response to protease inhibitor therapy for HIV infection in an Urban Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 1999, 22(4):358–363.
65. Vanhove GF et al. Patient compliance and drug failure in protease inhibitor monotherapy. JAMA, 1996, 276(24):1955–1956.
66. Little SJ et al. Antiretroviral-drug resistance among patients recently infected with HIV. The New England Journal of Medicine, 2002, 347(6):385–394.
67. UK Collaborative Group on Monitoring the Transmission of HIV. Drug resistance. Analysis of prevalence of HIV-1 drug resistance in primary infections in the United Kingdom. BMJ, 2001, 322(7294):1087–1088.
68. Bangsberg DR, Perry S, Charlesbois ED. Adherence to HAART predicts progression to AIDS. 8th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI), Chicago, 4–8 February 2001 (Abstract 483).
69. Lerner BH, Gulick RM, Dubler NN. Rethinking nonadherence: historical perspectives on triple-drug therapy for HIV disease. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1998, 129(7):573–578.
70. Carrieri P et al. The dynamic of adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy: results from the French National APROCO cohort. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2001, 28(3):232–239.
71. Walsh JC et al. Reasons for non-adherence to antiretroviral therapy: patients' perspectives provide evidence of multiple causes. AIDS Care, 2001, 13(6):709–720.
72. Tuldra A et al. Prospective randomized two-arm controlled study to determine the efficacy of a specific intervention to improve long-term adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2000, 25(3):221–228.
73. Bamberger JD et al. Helping the urban poor stay with antiretroviral HIV drug therapy. American Journal of Public Health, 2000, 90(5):699–701.
74. Walsh JC et al. An assessment of current HIV treatment adherence services in the UK. AIDS Care, 2002, 14(3):329–334.
75. Cingolani A et al. Usefulness of monitoring HIV drug resistance and adherence in individuals failing highly active antiretroviral therapy: a randomized study (ARGENTA). AIDS, 2002, 16(3):369–379.
76. Mannheimer S et al. The consistency of adherence to antiretroviral therapy predicts biologic outcomes for human immunodeficiency virus-infected persons in clinical trials.
Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2002, 34(8):1115–1121.
77. Chesney MA. Factors affecting adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2000, Suppl 2:S171–176.
78. Altice FL, Mostashari F, Friedland GH. Trust and the acceptance of and adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2001, 28(1):47–58.
79. Claxton AJ, Cramer J, Pierce C. A systematic review of the associations between dose regimens and medication compliance. Clinical Therapeutics, 2001, 23(8):1296–1310.
80. Bartlett JA et al. Overview of the effectiveness of triple combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected adults. AIDS, 2001, 15(11):1369–1377.
81. Paterson DL et al. Adherence to protease inhibitor therapy and outcomes in patients with HIV infection. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2000, 133(1):21–30.
82. Fumaz CR et al. Quality of life, emotional status, and adherence of HIV-1-infected patients treated with efavirenz versus protease inhibitor-containing regimens. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2002, 29(3):244–253.
83. Bartlett JA. Addressing the challenges of adherence [review]. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2002, 29 Suppl. 1:S2–S10.
84. Moore AL et al. Raised viral load in patients with viral suppression on highly active antiretroviral therapy: transient increase or treatment failure? AIDS, 2002, 16(4):615–618.
85. WHO antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in adults and adolescents: recommendations for a public health approach – 2006 revision. Geneva, WHO, 2006.
86. Nettles RE et al. Intermittent HIV-1 viremia (Blips) and drug resistance in patients receiving HAART. JAMA, 2005, 293(7):817–829.
87. Le Moing V et al. Predictors of long-term increase in CD4(+) cell counts in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients receiving a protease inhibitor-containing antiretroviral regimen. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2002, 185(4):471–480.
88. Smith CJ et al. Factors influencing increases in CD4 cell counts of HIV-positive persons receiving long-term highly active antiretroviral therapy. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2004, 190(10):1860–1868.
89. Hunt PW et al. Continued CD4 cell count increases in HIV-infected adults experiencing 4 years of viral suppression on antiretroviral therapy. AIDS, 2003, 17:1907–1915.
90. Graber S et al. Clinical outcome of patients with HIV-1 infection according to immunological and virologic response after 6 months of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2000, 133:401–410.
91. Aleman S et al. Drug resistance at low viraemia in HIV-1 infected patients with antiretroviral combination therapy. AIDS, 2002, 16:1039–1044.
92. Murri R et al. Is moderate HIV viremia associated with a higher risk of clinical progression in HIV-infected people treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, 2006, 41(1):23–30.
93. The PLATO Collaboration. Predictors of trend in CD4-positive T-cell count and mortality among HIV-1 infected individuals with virological failure to all three antiretroviral-drug classes. The Lancet, 2004, 364:51–62.
94. Barrios A et al. Paradoxical CD4+ T-cell decline in HIV-infected patients with complete virus suppression taking tenofovir and didanosine. AIDS, 2005, 19(6):569–575.
95. Gallant JE et al. Efficacy and safety of tenofovir DF vs stavudine in combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive patients: a 3-year randomized trial. JAMA, 2004, 292(2):191–201.
96. Miller MD et al. Decreased replication capacity of HIV-1 clinical isolates containing K65R or M184V RT mutations. 10th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI), Boston, 10–14 February 2003 (Abstract 616).
97. Parikh U et al. K65R: a multinucleoside resistance mutation of increasing prevalence exhibits bi-directional phenotypic antagonism with TAM. 11th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI), San Francisco, 8–11 February 2004 (Abstract 54).
98. Condra JH et al. Drug resistance and predicted virologic responses to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitor therapy. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2000, 182(3):758–765.
99. Kempf DJ et al. Analysis of the virological response with respect to baseline viral phenotype and genotype in protease inhibitor-experienced HIV-1-infected patients receiving lopinavir/ritonavir therapy. Antiviral Therapy, 2002, 7(3):165–174.
100. Martinez-Picado J et al. Replicative fitness of protease inhibitor-resistant mutants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Journal of Virology, 1999, 73(5):3744–3752.
101. Albrecht MA et al. Nelfinavir, efavirenz, or both after the failure of nucleoside treatment of HIV infection. The New England Journal of Medicine, 2001, 345(6):398–407.
102. Kessler H et al. CD4 cell increases through more than 4 years in antiretroviral-naïve HIV+ patients treated with lopinavir/ritonavir-based therapy. The 2nd IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment, International AIDS Society and ANRS, Paris, 13 July 2003 (Abstract 568).
103. Abbott’s new Kaletra tablet gets EMEA CHMP’s OK. Therapeutics Daily, 8 May 2006 (http://www.therapeuticsdaily.com/News/article.cfm?contenttype=sentryarticle&contentvalue=884529&channelID=31, accessed 9 May 2006).
104. Eron Jr J et al. The KLEAN study of fosamprenavir-ritonavir versus lopinavir-ritonavir, each in combination with abacavir-lamivudine, for initial treatment of HIV infection over 48 weeks: a randomised non-inferiority trial. The Lancet, 2006, 368(9534):476–482.
105. Slim J et al. Saquinavir/r BID vs. Lopinavir/r BID plus FTC/Tenofovir QD in ARV-naïve HIV-1 –infected patients: GEMINI study. 8th International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV infection, Glasgow, Scotland, UK, 12–16 November 2006.
106. Lazzarin A et al. Efficacy of enfuvirtide in patients infected with drug-resistant HIV-1 in Europe and Australia. The New England Journal of Medicine, 2003, 348(22):2186–2195.
107. Gonzalez-Lahoz J. The RESIST trials – superiority of tipranavir over other PIs. AIDS Reviews, 2004, 6(4):244–245.
108. Croom KF, Keam SJ. Tipranavir: a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor. Drugs, 2005, 65(12):1669–1679.
109. Clotet B et al. Efficacy and safety of darunavir-ritonavir at week 48 in treatment-experienced patients with HIV-1 infection in POWER 1 and 2: a pooled subgroup analysis of data from two randomised trials, The Lancet, 2007, 369: 1169–1178.
110. Markowitz M et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of tipranavir boosted with ritonavir in HIV-1–infected patients failing multiple protease inhibitor regimens 80-week data from a phase 2 study, Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (in press).
111. Gathe Jr JC et al. Efficacy and safety of three doses of tipranavir boosted with ritonavir in treatment-experienced HIV type 1-infected patients, AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, 2007, 23(2):216–223.
112. Oldfield V, Keating GM, Plosker G. Enfuvirtide: a review of its use in the management of HIV infection, Drugs, 2005, 65(8):1139–1160.
113. Turner D et al. The influence of protease inhibitor resistance profiles on selection of HIV therapy in treatment-naive patients. Antiviral Therapy, 2004, 9(3):301–314.
114. Rottmann C et al: Atazanavir ritonavir saquinavir without any other antiretroviral drugs in protease inhibitor experienced patients with no reverse transcriptase options: a 24 week cohort analysis. 7th International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection, Glasgow, 14–18 November 2004 (Abstract P21).
115. Stephan C et al. Saquinavir drug exposure is not impaired by the boosted double protease inhibitor combination of lopinavir/ritonavir. AIDS, 2004, 18(3):503–508.
116. Eron Jr J et al. A phase II trial of dual protease inhibitor therapy: amprenavir in combination with indinavir, nelfinavir, or saquinavir. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2001, 26(5):458–461.
117. Boffito M et al. Atazanavir enhances saquinavir hard-gel concentrations in a ritonavir-boosted once-daily regimen. AIDS, 2004, 18(9):1291–1297.
118. Ananworanich J et al. CD4-guided scheduled treatments interruptions compared to continuous therapy: results of the Staccato trial. 13th Annual Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI), Denver, 5–8 February 2006 (Abstract 102).
119. Skiest D et al. Predictors of HIV disease progression in patients who stop ART with CD4 cell counts >350 cells/mm3. 13th Annual Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI), Denver, 5–8 February 2006 (Abstract 101).
120. Marchou B et al. Structured treatment interruptions in HIV-infected patients with high CD4 cell counts and virologic suppression: results of a prospective, randomized, open-label trial (Window - ANRS 106). 13th Annual Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI), Denver, 5–8 February 2006 (Abstract 104).
121. Danel C et al. CD4-guided strategy arm stopped in a randomized structured treatment interruption trial in West African adults: ANRS 1269 Trivacan trial. 13th Annual Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI), Denver, 5–8 February 2006 (Abstract 105LB).
122. El-Sadr W et al. Episodic CD4-guided use of art is inferior to continuous therapy: results of the SMART study. 13th Annual Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI), Denver, 5–8 February 2006 (Abstract 106LB).
123. Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy (SMART) Study Group, El-Sadr WM et al. CD4+ count-guided interruption of antiretroviral treatment. The New England Journal of Medicine, 2006, 355(22):2283–2296.
124. Jacobson MA et al. Cytomegalovirus retinitis after initiation of highly active antiretroviral therapy. The Lancet, 1997, 349(9063):1443–1445.
125. Race EM et al. Focal mycobacterial lymphadenitis following initiation of protease-inhibitor therapy in patients with advanced HIV-1 disease. The Lancet, 1998, 351(9098):252–255.
126. Koval CE et al. Immune reconstitution syndrome after successful treatment of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in a man with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2002, 35(4):491–493.
127. Carrieri MP et al. Impact of early versus late adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy on immuno-virological response: a 3–year follow-up study. Antiviral Therapy, 2003, 8(6):585–594.
128. Safren SA et al. Two strategies to increase adherence to HIV antiretroviral medication: life-steps and medication monitoring. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2001, (10):1151–1162.
129. Simoni JM et al. Antiretroviral adherence interventions: a review of current literature and ongoing studies. Topics in HIV Medicine, 2003, 11(6):185–198.
130. Golin CE, Smith SR, Reif S. Adherence counseling practices of generalist and specialist physicians caring for people living with HIV/AIDS in North Carolina. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2004, 19(1):16–27.
131. Weber R et al. Effect of individual cognitive behaviour intervention on adherence to antiretroviral therapy: prospective randomized trial. Antiviral Therapy, 2004, 9(1):85–95.
132. Kerr T et al. Psychosocial determinants of adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy among injection drug users in Vancouver. Antiviral Therapy, 2004, 9(3):407–414.
133. Tyndall MW et al. Attendance, drug use patterns, and referrals made from North America's first supervised injection facility. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 2005, December.
134. Yun LW et al. Antidepressant treatment improves adherence to antiretroviral therapy among depressed HIV-infected patients. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2005, 38(4):432–438.
135. Zimmermann AE et al. Tenofovir-associated acute and chronic kidney disease: a case of multiple drug interactions. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2006, 42(2):283–290.
136. Bartlett JG. Pocket guide to adult HIV/AIDS treatment. Baltimore, John Hopkins University AIDS Service, 2006 (http://hopkins-aids.edu/publications/pocketguide/pocketgd0106.pdf, accessed 11 September 2006).
137. Sande MA, Eliopoulos GM. The Sanford guide to HIV/AIDS therapy, 13th ed. Hyde Park, VT, Antimicrobial Therapy, 2004.
138. Gilbert DN, Moellering RC, Eliopoulos GM. The Sanford guide to antimicrobial therapy, 35th ed. Hyde Park, VT, Antimicrobial Therapy, 2005.
139. Antoniu T, Tseng AL. Interactions between recreational drugs and antiretroviral agents. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 2002, 36(10):1598–1613.
140. WHO/EURO report of the technical consultation on clinical staging of HIV/AIDS and HIV/AIDS case definition for surveillance. Copenhagen, WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2005 (http://www.euro.who.int/document/E87956.pdf, accessed 5 April 2006).
141. 2006 antiretroviral drug guide. IAPAC Monthly, 2006, 12 Suppl. 1 (http://www.iapac.org/home.asp?pid=7288, accessed 11 September 2006).
142. Liu H et al. A comparison study of multiple measures of adherence to HIV protease inhibitors. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2001, 134(10):968–977.
143. Bangsberg DR et al. Provider assessment of adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2001, 26(5):435–442.
144. Hugen PW et al. Assessment of adherence to HIV protease inhibitors: comparison and combination of various methods, including MEMS (electronic monitoring), patient and nurse report, and therapeutic drug monitoring. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2002, 30(3):324–334.
145. Paterson DL et al. Adherence to protease inhibitor therapy and outcomes in patients with HIV infection. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2000, 133(1):21–30.
146. Parienti JJ et al. The pills identification test: a tool to assess adherence to antiretroviral therapy. JAMA, 2001, 285(4):412.
147. Descamps D et al. Mechanisms of virologic failure in previously untreated HIV-infected patients from a trial of induction-maintenance therapy. JAMA, 2000, 283(2):205–11.
148. Havlir DV et al. Drug susceptibility in HIV infection after viral rebound in patients receiving indinavir-containing regimens. JAMA, 2000, 283(2):229–234.
149. Vingerhoets J et al. Effect of baseline resistance on the virologic response to a novel NNRTI, TMC 125, in patients with extensive NNRTI and PI resistance: analysis of study TMC 125–233. 13th Annual Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI), Denver, 5–8 February 2006 (Abstract 154).
150. De Meyer et al. Effect of baseline susceptibility and on-treatment mutations on TMC 114 and control PI efficacy: preliminary analysis of data from PI-experienced patients from POWER 1 and POWER 2. 13th Annual Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI), Denver, 5–8 February 2006 (Abstract 157).
